techinodrming

A brand new law in California protects a consumer's right to post online reviews about a company.

Governor Jerry Brown signed the balance into law at the begining of September, also it took immediate effect. The legislation was spurred by the story of the couple on the receiving end of a $3,500 bill online retailer KlearGear.

John Palmer and Jennifer Kulas wrote meizitang strong version a negative review of the company on RipoffReport.com. Claiming that the couple violated a non-disparagement clause in the tos, KlearGear sent the bill. The pair refused to pay for and later claimed inside a lawsuit from the company their credit was damaged consequently. In July, a federal judge ordered KlearGear to pay Palmer and Kulas $306,750.

When the story made headlines and consumers learned about the presence of such clauses, the California Legislature sprang into action and passed the balance with a vote of 27 to 9 within the Senate and 63 to 14 in the Assembly.

Assembly Bill 2365 bans non-disparagement clauses or similar terms that restrict a consumer's right to post a review. A consumer may accept a clause, but their rights should be "knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently" waived.

Attempts to enforce such a clause could cause penalties ranging from $2,500 for a first-time offense up to $10,000. State attorneys are tasked with enforcement, but the law also grants consumers a private right of action and notes that the penalties set forth within the statute aren't the exclusive remedies open to plaintiffs.

Individuals or companies that host online consumer reviews or surveys are not prohibited from removing an argument that is otherwise lawful to get rid of.

To see the new law, click the link.

Why it matters: Companies should familiarize zi xiu tang slimming capsule themselves using the new law and remove or amend non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts as necessary.

Court Keeps Deceptive Advertising Suit Against Beer Company Alive